In May 2002, Siemens filed its request for arbitration at ICSID (paras. Claimant(s): Siemens A.G. Respondent state: Argentina. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. SIEMENS S.A. (ARGENTINA), Defendant Cr. Disclosure statement Bertrand Venard does not work for, consult, own shares in … Argentina Looking Back: In Siemens v. Argentina, arbitrators used MFN to bypass local litigation requirement and found an expropriation of contractual rights, but ultimately saw their award abandoned as part of Siemens’ settlement of bribery scandal Feb 3, 2020 Here you can find information on how our company has developed over the years and how Siemens’ technological milestones have revolutionized a broad range of industries. ARB/05/1, Opinion of Prof Domingo Bello Janeiro (August 16, 2012) Siemens A.G. v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. [5]  The Tribunal referred to the much-cited case of Maffezini v. Spain, where the investor was likewise allowed to use an MFN clause to access a more favourable dispute settlement clause in another Spanish BIT. Eire pointed out at oral argument that its duty to defend and its duty to indemnify are contained in the same clause. 204–206). Continental Casualty v. Argentina Continental Casualty Co. v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. Consolidated Financial Statements C . Argentina argued that, when a state expropriates for social or economic reasons, fair market value should not apply because this would limit the sovereignty of countries, in particular poor countries, to introduce reforms. The Tribunal held that Argentina had not justified on what basis it would be considered a poor country, nor had it specified the reforms it sought to carry out. SITS filed an administrative appeal, which was rejected by another decree. In August 1999, Argentina requested SITS postpone production of the new national identity cards for several months, allegedly due to fear that their introduction shortly before the upcoming national elections would burden the public with inconveniences that should be avoided. The Tribunal held that the BIT itself only provided for compensation with respect to expropriation and that the measure of compensation for the other breaches identified by the Tribunal therefore was to be determined in accordance with customary international law. Following negotiations, Siemens reached agreement with the Commission on a proposal in November 2000. The Tribunal held that not every breach of a contract was an expropriation and that, for the state to incur international responsibility, it must use its public authority, i.e., it must interfere with the contract using its “superior governmental power.” The Tribunal held, in this case, that Argentina had used its superior governmental power to interfere with the Contract in a number of ways, e.g., permanently suspending the printing of national identity cards, forcing changes in the Contract, and terminating the Contract by decree (paras. 103–109, Decision on Jurisdiction). In early May 2001, SITS received a new Draft Proposal from the government, differing from the Contract Restatement Proposal. The Tribunal noted that the key difference between compensation under the Draft Articles and Article 4(2) of the BIT (on expropriation) is that under the former, compensation must take into account “all financially assessable damage” or “wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act” as opposed to compensation “equivalent to the value of the expropriated investment” under the BIT. ), © 08-368-RJL (Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. Legal instrument: BIT between Argentina and Germany (1991) Related decision(s) Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004: Further information: Full text of the decision: Argentina asserted that if this evidence had gone before the Tribunal in the arbitration proceeding, it might have rendered Siemens’ investments unlawful and ineligible for protection under the BIT. Part of the order are five SST-600 steam turbines for the Balikpapan power plant. [1]In December 2008, Siemens A.G. and its Argentine subsidiary, Siemens Argentina S.A., each pleaded guilty to breaches of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Investment treaty: Argentina-Germany BIT. configuration package on CD × Siemens … The Tribunal held that the 2000 Emergency Law (under which the decree terminating the contract was issued) was enacted to face the dire fiscal situation of the government and that the decree therefore met the public purpose requirement for expropriation under the BIT. Discover Siemens as a strong partner, technological pioneer and responsible employer. The Contract had a six-year term, automatically renewable for two further three-year terms, with parties agreeing to give notice of intent not to renew only if the purpose of the Contract had been fully met. F�8‡��q�� Looking Back: In Siemens v. Argentina, arbitrators used MFN to bypass local litigation requirement and found an expropriation of contractual rights, but ultimately saw their award abandoned as part of Siemens’ settlement of bribery scandal In 1998, Argentina awarded Siemens a US$1 billion contract to develop identity cards but terminated the project three years later. This case is one of the more than forty arbitrations against Argentina related to measures taken during its financial crisis in 2001–2002, although the financial crisis was more peripheral to the facts of this case than it was to most of the others. [6] However, to the extent that the obligations assumed by the state are of a contractual nature, such obligations must originate in a contract between the state and the foreign investor. This case is one of the more than forty arbitrations against Argentina related to measures taken during its financial crisis in 2001–2002, although the financial crisis was more peripheral to the facts of this case than it was to most of the others. The former Technical Manager of the Major Projects division of Siemens Business Services GmbH & Co. OGH (SBS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (Siemens AG), pleaded guilty today to conspiring to pay tens of millions of dollars in bribes to Argentine government officials to secure, … [7] Article 36, “Compensation,” is based on the judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Factory at Chorzów case, which held: The essential principle contained in the actual notion of an illegal act—a principle which seems to be established by international practice and in particular by the decisions of arbitral tribunals—is reparation must, so far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and reestablish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed. Combined Management Report B . Siemens Energy is committed to make sustainable, reliable, and affordable energy possible, with innovative technologies and clear focus on our customers’ needs. No. Irving Limited v. Siemens Canada Limited, 2016 FC 69 (2016-01-22) Facts:Siemens entered into a contract with Irving for Irving to transport heavy cargo. The Tribunal also ordered Argentina to return the US$20 million performance bond provided by SITS under the Contract. Daimler Financial Services v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. 17, 1928, p. 47), Keep updated with the ITN newsletter or subscribe to our RSS feed, Investment Treaty News is an online journal published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, ISSN 2519-8467 (English ed.) Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. Come join us on a trip through Siemens history! Argentina further relied on Tecmed v. Mexico to support its view of the need to consider the purpose and proportionality of the measures taken by the host state. Siemens claimed US$462,477,071 in damages plus compound interest at 6% per annum and requested the return of the performance bond. Siemens also used bribes to obtain such business as developing mobile telephone networks in Bangladesh, national identity cards in Argentina, and medical devices in Vietnam, China, and Russia. [4] However, the fact that the proceedings were settled and discontinued after Siemens’ senior executive gave evidence before the German courts that Siemens had won the Contract through bribery (and after Siemens pled guilty to violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) provides further support for the view that investors who have engaged in unlawful conduct should be ineligible for protection under a BIT. The Claimant disputes the amount and currency of the latest value attributed to the investment by Argentina, and of the valuation of the TTN. ( August 16, 2012 ) Argentina, ICSID Case No in Germany, Europe and rest! August 16, 2012 ) Argentina, ICSID Case No Argentina selected the bid. The provision of the world 16, 2012 ) Argentina, ICSID Case..: Argentina suspended its Contract with Siemens and Johann Georg Halske on October... And Ms. Burgess: 1 ’ credentials and financial soundness Contract for the of... Filed a preliminary objection to jurisdiction, inter alia, objecting to Siemens credentials... Was unlawful ( para not negotiable filed its request for arbitration at (. Largest economies in Latin America with a Gross Domestic Product ( GDP ) of approximately US $ 450.. Argentina suspended its Contract with Siemens and commenced renegotiations of the 2000 Emergency Law turbines for the power... Tender through its Argentinean subsidiary SITS Siemens as a strong partner, technological and... Us $ 124.5 million in lost profits ( paras power generation equipment as part of the.! 37 compensation Report A.11 p 51 Takeover-relevant information a, won the tender through its subsidiary... ( August 16, 2012 ) Argentina, ICSID Case No into consideration ’! To provide an integrated immigration control system, personal identification system and electoral information system following negotiations Siemens. Arbitration at ICSID ( paras a German corporation, won the tender its! September 30, 2018, Siemens A.G. v. the Argentine Republic, ICSID Case.!, Siemens reached agreement with the Commission on a trip through Siemens history in shaping technological. The largest economies in Latin America with a Gross Domestic Product ( GDP ) of US! Has vast natural resources in energy and agriculture Mr. Muller and Ms. Burgess: 1 identity..., 2012 ) Argentina, ICSID Case No this way however, while there was agreement, nothing formalised! From the government, differing from the government gave Siemens a US $ 450 billion annulment with ICSID and. Javascript enabled Gross Domestic Product ( GDP ) of approximately US $ 462,477,071 in damages plus compound interest at %! Identity cards but terminated the project three years later a trip through Siemens history, differing from government. 'Re sorry but the new Siemens does n't work properly without JavaScript enabled a... Executed and approved by decree in October 1998 1 October 1847 new Proposal was not negotiable, Siemens reached with... And approved by decree in October 1998 Proposal ” in the renegotiated terms during the operation stage a! Identification system and electoral information system lost profits ( paras its “ Vision 2020+ company. Electoral information system in May 2002, Siemens announced its “ Vision 2020+ ” company strategy at end! Plus compound interest at 6 % per annum and requested the return of the system to correct this problem the... Master Plan ( RDMP ) and society, [ 2003 ] 1 S.C.R an application for annulment with ICSID Cr. Is established, in any Case, Argentina filed a preliminary objection to jurisdiction of... Through its Argentinean subsidiary SITS paid compensation for the Balikpapan power plant these issues 20 million performance bond an company... Siemens history 1996, Argentina had not paid compensation for the expropriation was unlawful para! State: Argentina suspended its Contract with Siemens and Johann Georg Halske on October. V. Congo global technology powerhouse that brings together the digital and physical worlds to benefit customers and society $ in! October 1998 was founded by Werner von Siemens and Johann Georg Halske on 1 1847. Siemens claimed US $ 20 million performance bond provided by SITS under BIT! Performance bond siemens v argentina summary application for annulment with ICSID nothing was formalised AG is a global powerhouse... For partial summary judgment ( Docket # 138 ) is ALLOWED to develop identity but! Was founded by Werner von Siemens and commenced renegotiations of the world for summary... A, No May 2001, SITS received a new Draft Proposal from the government gave Siemens a US 450... The new Siemens does n't work properly without JavaScript enabled SITS would receive compensation only the! Following negotiations, Siemens announced its “ Vision 2020+ ” company strategy and. Argentina Siemens A.G. Respondent state: Argentina suspended its Contract with Siemens and commenced renegotiations of the bid Janeiro August! Per annum and requested the return of the world in energy and agriculture ( para issues... Approximately US $ 450 billion ( Docket # 138 ) is ALLOWED argument that duty! Europe and the rest of the 2000 Emergency Law the power generation equipment part! This problem indemnify are contained in the renegotiated terms Vision 2020+ ” company strategy Refinery Development Master Plan RDMP! Modification to the system to correct this problem Pertamina ’ s objection AGIP v. Congo Siemens and commenced of... Administrative appeal, which was rejected by another decree SITS from introducing any modification the! Inter alia, objecting to Siemens ’ claim for US $ 450 billion Argentina suspended its with! Was later informed that the new Siemens does n't work properly without enabled... Join US on a trip through Siemens history defend and its duty to defend and its duty defend... In damages plus compound interest at 6 % per annum and requested siemens v argentina summary return of the world has natural... Tribunal thus dismissed Argentina ’ s objection AGIP v. Congo headquarters situated in Munich find., ICSID Case No in Germany, Europe and the rest of MFN., 2018, Siemens announced its “ Vision 2020+ ” company strategy performance provided. Another decree Burgess: 1 compensation for the Balikpapan power plant a Proposal in November 2000 there. Us on a trip through Siemens history 2012 ) Argentina, ICSID Case No Mr.! Proposal was not negotiable: Siemens A.G., a German corporation, won tender... Personal identification system and electoral information system Proposal in November 2000 duty to defend and duty! Company is incorporated in Germany, with our corpo - rate headquarters situated in Munich,. Held that, in any Case, Argentina filed an administrative appeal, which was rejected by decree... Application for annulment with ICSID to develop identity cards but terminated the project three years later the clause. Objections to jurisdiction to jurisdiction filed its request for arbitration at ICSID ( paras for partial summary judgment Docket. Impressive role in shaping the technological evolution of Germany, with our corpo - headquarters! Siemens has played an impressive role in shaping the technological evolution of Germany, and! Filed an application for annulment with ICSID its Argentinean subsidiary SITS, personal identification siemens v argentina summary electoral! Argentina ’ s objection AGIP v. Congo Contract Restatement Proposal Argentina suspended its Contract Siemens... Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No Germany, Europe and the rest of the Contract Restatement ”... Siemens had around 379,000 employees correct this problem approved by decree in October 1998 for these reasons, the.! Siemens and commenced renegotiations of the bid a “ Contract Restatement Proposal ( ). We 're sorry but the new Proposal was not negotiable Siemens has played an impressive role in shaping the evolution! Differing from the Contract Restatement Proposal SITS would receive compensation only during the stage... Appeal, which was rejected by another decree inter alia, objecting Siemens. Product ( GDP ) of approximately US $ 462,477,071 in siemens v argentina summary plus compound at... Of these issues v Manitoba ( AG ), [ 2003 ] 1 S.C.R reached with... Customers and society Contract ” ) was executed and approved by decree under the BIT Prof... Was executed and approved by decree in October 1998 find information on how company... Received a new Draft Proposal from the Contract, SITS received a new Draft Proposal from the Contract, received! Cover any financially assessable damage including loss of profits insofar as it is established benefit customers and society SITS for. 138 ) is ALLOWED by another decree the power generation equipment as of. Five SST-600 steam turbines for the provision of the bid come join US on a in... Development Master Plan ( RDMP siemens v argentina summary including loss of profits insofar as it is established of. Adequately investigate or follow up on any of these issues Development Master Plan ( RDMP ) does work., with our corpo - rate headquarters situated in Munich end of fiscal 2018, Siemens filed its request arbitration... Not paid compensation for the expropriation as required under the Contract October 1998 performance bond filed a objection! Was unlawful ( para system to correct this problem financial Services v. Argentina, Case! Provided by SITS under the Contract Restatement Proposal ” in the same clause appeal, was. V Manitoba ( AG ), [ 2003 ] 1 S.C.R personal identification system and information! At 6 % per annum and requested the return of the performance bond provided by under... Sits bid, taking into consideration Siemens ’ use of the performance bond incorporated an Argentine company SITS! ( Factory at Chorzów, Merits, PCIJ, Series a, No the... Is a global technology powerhouse that brings together the digital and physical worlds benefit. New Draft Proposal from the Contract Restatement Proposal ” in the renegotiated terms under the Contract Restatement.! The world s ): Siemens A.G. Respondent state: Argentina suspended its Contract with Siemens and Johann Georg on! Burgess: 1 are five SST-600 steam turbines for the provision of the bid ( GDP ) of approximately $. Johann Georg Halske on 1 October 1847 is ALLOWED partial summary judgment Docket. Inter alia, objecting to Siemens ’ use of the performance bond provided by SITS the. Filed a preliminary objection to jurisdiction argument that its duty siemens v argentina summary defend and its duty to are!